Demonstrators protest against conversion therapy outside the US Supreme Court as the Court hears oral arguments in Chiles v. Salazar. | Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court broke from its increasingly common practice of deciding important cases without holding an oral argument or even explaining the reasoning of its decision, to hear a case about whether states may ban a practice known as “conversion therapy” — therapy sessions which seek to change someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity.
About half of the states have laws banning conver...
HALO NEWSLETTER
Join HALO today and unlock this story instantly — It's Free